How is self esteem measured

All predictors were included in the model in a single step to identify the best predictor of the criterion variables neuroticism and vulnerable narcissism.

All associations were as assumed: higher scores on stability were associated with lower neuroticism and narcissism. The SESS exhibited the highest substantial relations to both criteria, as indicated by the partial correlations between each of the predictors and the criteria, controlling for the remaining two predictors. Table 3. Multiple regression analyses in predicting neuroticism and vulnerable narcissism. For this purpose, hierarchical two-step regression models were calculated in which the general level of self-esteem was entered as a predictor in the first step, and the three stability measures were entered in the second step.

Differences between the direct measures were small; however, the SESS appeared to be the strongest predictor of the three. Table 4. Results of multiple regression analyses predicting neuroticism and vulnerable narcissism. The aim of Study 4 was to evaluate the validity of our three-item SESS with respect to predicting couples' relationship satisfaction. As mentioned above, the perception that one's partner has unstable self-esteem seems to be a crucial issue for low relationship satisfaction.

As shown by Altmann et al. Therefore, we expected that the rating of one's partner's self-esteem stability would be the most relevant predictor of relationship satisfaction. Because of the high correlations between self-esteem and stability of self-esteem, the incremental validity of the stability measure over general self-esteem was once again considered in the analyses.

Participants were recruited in local institutions such as schools teachers , sports clubs, on campus academic and nonacademic personnel as well as students , and via social media postings, e. Interested persons received paper-and-pencil questionnaires with two stamped return envelopes for themselves and their partner if both were of legal age and both would describe themselves as being in an ongoing, stable, long-term relationship.

Anonymity concerns by several potential participants forced us to omit questions concerning their current work situation. Of the sample, The length of relationship ranged from 0. The RAS consists of seven items and was designed to be a general measure of relationship satisfaction. Partner ratings were also gathered with regard to the global level of self-esteem and self-esteem stability using specially created partner versions of the RSES and SESS.

In these modified versions, participants were asked to indicate the extent to which they agreed with statements describing their relationship partner. Agreement about one another's self-esteem as well as the stability of self-esteem i. These results are comparable to previous findings on self-other agreement regarding personality in samples of couples Watson et al. A meta-analysis of 28 studies of romantic partners by Fletcher and Kerr revealed a mean effect size for tracking accuracy in personality traits of 0.

To compare the predictive power of self-esteem stability as measured by the SESS to the predictive power of the general level of self-esteem as measured by the RSES, relationship satisfaction was predicted with two regression models. Both models were calculated for self-ratings, other ratings of the same person, and that person's other ratings of their partner see Table 5 ; note: complete correlation table see Supplementary Material.

Table 5. As expected, head-to-head comparisons revealed that ratings of one's partner were the best predictors of relationship satisfaction, followed by self-ratings. By contrast, other ratings by partners did not predict relationship satisfaction. It is interesting that there was clear evidence for the incremental validity of the SESS as a stability measure over and above the general level of self-esteem, whereas general-self-esteem did not contribute incrementally to predicting relationship satisfaction over and above the SESS.

This provides clear evidence for the relevance of the SESS, which demonstrated predictive power beyond the general level of self-esteem. All associations were as assumed: higher self-esteem level and stability were associated with higher relationship satisfaction.

Self-esteem stability is considered an important variable for psychological functioning and is receiving growing attention. The few inventories involving direct cross-sectional assessment exhibit similar deficits in validity, making new developments necessary.

Psychometric properties were found to be satisfactory, and the factor structure was unidimensional, as expected. The SESS was found to have superior predictive power compared to existing measures and demonstrated incremental validity beyond self-esteem level. The fact that previous studies and the results presented here have consistently shown that self-esteem stability is incrementally predictive over self-esteem level further supports the notion that both of these aspects should be taken into account when operationalizing self-esteem.

The joint administration of very brief SESS, which encompasses only three items, with the RSES is economical, relatively efficient, and exhibits significant incremental predictive power above and beyond the RSES with regard to both individual and dyadic outcomes.

However, even the SESS, the best predictor, yielded only moderate results. Thus, the indirect and direct measures might assess different aspects ofself-esteemstability, which makes sense given their quite different requirements. One has to bear in mind, however, that the questionnaires are filled out by participants on their own accord, at specific moments in their lives, and only when the participant is willing to do so in a particular situation.

It is highly unlikely that participants will pause, sit down, and fill out the RSES when they are in a moment of flow or ecstasy, or in an acute self-esteem threatening situation. This measurement approach might therefore work best when the research question focuses on non-extreme or normal day-to-day variation, or when one's ability to self-reflect is reduced e. The direct assessment, on the other hand, requires participants to reflect on their general experiences of fluctuation in their self-evaluations.

Therefore, this approach might primarily assess a retrospective construct, namely one's individual self-concept of one's stability of self-evaluations, i. The results of our study further indicate that this might be influenced by a person's general self-image of their general emotional stability, as we found substantial and significant correlations with neuroticism and vulnerable narcissism.

This measurement approach might function best for research on the general population and with subjects with an intact self-reflective ability. Self-esteem stability scales are still in the process of optimization and still have challenges to overcome. We will discuss two such challenges in detail here.

First, further research is needed on the definition of the time period to which self-esteem stability refers. There is not yet a standard on what number of assessments or period of time is optimal for providing the best estimate of short-term variations when using the indirect assessment. It seems beneficial for future research to distinguish between variability that occurs within a day compared to that which occurs over a period of 2—4 weeks, as they might have vastly different causes and consequences.

Daily, weekly, and monthly changes might be influenced by different factors and might therefore produce different incremental values. Examining the relationships between contingent self-esteem e. The second issue is the generally high correlation with self-esteem level. Subjects might have trouble answering self-esteem items asking them to reflect only on the present moment.

Their general self-esteem level might be more accessible and might therefore influence or distort their response. Implicit measurements could be a solution if there is no substantial discrepancy between the subjects explicit and implicit self-esteem.

Further research might use scenarios or items with symbols e. The results presented here must naturally be treated with caution. The samples tended to be predominantly female and were recruited on a voluntary basis, which might have produced a bias that cannot be discounted due to the non-representativeness of the sample. The risk of subjects filling out several self-esteem questionnaires at once instead of at different times as instructed remains.

Comparably, all questionnaire data rest upon the assumption that subjects are honest and conscientious instead of providing random answers. Even handing out only one copy at a time cannot guarantee honest participation. In the present studies, questionnaires we kept extremely short, interviewed the participants afterwards, and paid comparably well to further minimize the likelihood of deception. Furthermore, we administered the German versions of all inventories to German-speaking samples. Thus, the generalizability of our results to other populations particularly those from different cultural circles such as Asia and their replicability in different languages cannot be guaranteed and must be the subject of further studies.

Given that the items of the newly presented SESS were phrased similarly as previous stability measures as well as the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, the likelihood of achieving comparable results in English-speaking populations can be considered to be rather high. We hope to stimulate further research on self-esteem stability by providing the items of the SESS in English and German. TA and MR: Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work.

TA and MR: Drafting the work and revising it critically for important intellectual content. TA and MR: Final approval of the version to be published. TA and MR: Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Altmann, T. I guess you're just not my type: personality types and similarity between types as predictors of satisfaction in intimate couples.

Bentall, R. Hypomanic personality, stability of self-esteem and response styles to negative mood. Psychother 18, — Butler, A. A comparison of self-esteem lability and low trait self-esteem as vulnerability factors for depression.

Campbell, W. Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: two portraits of self-love. Chabrol, H. Preliminary results of a scale assessing instability of self-esteem. Costa, P. Costello, A. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis.

Google Scholar. Crocker, J. Contingencies of self-worth. Diener, E. The satisfaction with life scale. Fletcher, G. Through the eyes of love: reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Foster, J. Linking adult attachment to self-esteem stability. Self Identity 6, 64— Heatherton, T. Development and validation of a scale for measuring state selfesteem.

Hendrick, S. A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Marriage Fam. Horn, J. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis.

Psychometrika 30, — Kernis, M. Measuring self-esteem in context: the importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning.

Stability and level of self-esteem as predictors of anger arousal and hostility. Stability of self-esteem: assessment, correlates, and excuse making. Stability of self-esteem as a moderator of the relation between level of self-esteem and depression. Secure versus fragile high self-esteem as a predictor of verbal defensiveness: converging findings across three different markers.

Kim, J. Mean-level change and intraindividual variability in self-esteem and depression among high-risk children. Linton, K. Self-esteem in adolescents: validation of the state self-esteem scale. Marsh, H. Self-esteem stability and responses to the stability of self scale. Okada, R. A meta-analytic review of the relation between self-esteem level and self-esteem instability. Oosterwegel, A.

The relation of self-esteem variability to emotion variability, mood, personality traits, and depressive tendencies. Pincus, A. Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory.

Rhodewalt, F. Narcissism, self-knowledge organization, and emotional reactivity: the effect of daily experiences on self-esteem and affect. Roberts, J. Level and stability of self-esteem as predictors of depressive symptoms.

Rosenberg, M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Conceiving the Self. Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: different concepts, different outcomes. Roth, M. Dimensionality and norms of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in a German general population sample.

Schacter, D. In this study self-esteem is compared between the children with non-attendance at school and those who attend school. Therapists and parents tend to think that self-esteem in children with non-attendance at school is low in Social Scale.

However, in actually their self-esteem is significantly low in Academic Scale and Family Scale. We can support both areas with comparative ease using methods such as individual study guidance and change of relationships between family members.

Evaluating self-esteem facilitate the establishment of tangible treatment plans. Our institution uses Pope's 5-Scale Test of Self-Esteem for Children as part of the examinations and uses the same in our treatment. A case study is provided below. Process: The subject suffered from abdominal aches in June of the first year of middle school.

His abdominal issues worsened over time and symptoms of anticipatory anxiety developed. Thus, the patient was prohibited from leaving the house. He visited our hospital in March of the following year with complaints of abdominal pains leading to school absence. He was diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome and began medicinal treatment. Physical symptoms improved but the patient was afraid to go outside, and thus was unable to return to school.

He began inpatient treatment in May of the third year of middle school. After admission, he began interacting with others within the in-hospital classes and gained confidence in relationships with others. Upon reflection of his relationship with his parents, we were able to reaffirm that he was accepted within his family.

Conversely, because scores in Academic Scale continued to be low, the school was asked to focus on providing remedial study after he returned to school. Individual study guidance was given, and the patient graduated to high school. Medical problems stabilized and treatment was ended. If we assume that low self-esteem has an impact on patient prognosis, then it is beneficial from a therapeutic standpoint to identify and address the causes of low self-esteem.

Our study revealed that family dysfunction problems such as a family member with a psychiatric disorder, economic hardship, or experience of child abuse have an impact on self-esteem. Moreover, patients and their families often do not report such problems to their therapists. As such, this evidence gives reason to suspect that certain problems may exist within the home of seemingly normal families. Thus, when therapists discover that a child has low self-esteem in many different areas, an assessment of family functionality is necessary.

Therapists should consider children with such family dysfunction problems as being at risk of having low self-esteem and should take appropriate action at an early stage. Further, increased support from outside the family can be effective when encouraging the child, particularly when the support from his or her family is insufficient.

Self-esteem can be improved if schools, juvenile consultation centers, and others work together to create a haven outside of the home where children feel accepted. In such cases, treatment should first be approached from areas that facilitate cooperation, for example, public health nurses and school nurses can supplement the role of parents by providing encouragement and information to children in regard to their future. We conclude that a non-diagnostic evaluation axis is necessary to understand the pathological condition of children with psychosomatic disorders and project the treatment prognosis and that assessment of self-esteem can be an effective method.

James W: The Principles of Psychology. Book Google Scholar. Google Scholar. Personality and Persuasibility. Coopersmith S: The Antecedents of Self-esteem. Zeitschrift fur Gesundheits psychologie. Qual Life Res. Shiomura K: Measuring of implicit self-concept and validity. Self Psychology 6. Edited by: Shimotomai A. J Pers Soc Psychol. Harter S: Developmental perspective on the self system. Edited by: Hetherington EM. Rev Educ Res. Article Google Scholar.

Kokenes B: Grade level differences in factor of self-esteem. Develop-mental Psychology. J Japan Pedia Soc. Masuda A, Yasuko T: The effect of experience in school absenteeism during adolescence on self-esteem. Kasuya T, Kawamura S: The relationship between maladaptation and social skills, as well as self-esteem in Junior high school students: comparison between school nonattendance and attendance. Jpn J Counsel Sci. Eur Psychiatry. Int J Eat Disord. Article PubMed Google Scholar. J Res Adolesc.

Health Rep. Psychosom Med. Pediatr Nephrol. Acta Med Okayama. PubMed Google Scholar. Findings from the National longitudinal study on adolescent health. Download references. We are deeply grateful to Professor H. Tanaka and Professor T. Morishima for their support in carrying out this study.

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Correspondence to Mizuho Hosogi. The authors wrote the manuscript and holds final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Reprints and Permissions. Hosogi, M. Importance and usefulness of evaluating self-esteem in children. BioPsychoSocial Med 6, 9 Download citation.

Received : 30 December Accepted : 20 March Published : 20 March Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content. Search all BMC articles Search. Download PDF. Abstract Self-esteem is the "feeling of self-appreciation" and is an indispensable emotion for people to adapt to society and live their lives.

Introduction UNICEF's adoption of the document "A World Fit for Children" states that children, including adolescents, must be empowered to exercise their right to expression in accordance with their evolving capacity; build self-esteem; and acquire knowledge and skills needed for conflict resolution, decision-making, communication, and endurance of life's challenges. Definition of self-esteem Kant and others have argued conventionally from a philosophical and ethical standpoint that self-esteem is "the awareness of the absolute value of one's own personality or dignity.

Method for evaluating self-esteem A variety of methods are used for evaluating self-esteem. Rosenberg self-esteem scale Rosenberg [ 2 ] was the first to incorporate questionnaires into research on self-esteem. Janis-field feeling of inadequacy scale Janis and Field [ 3 ] defined self-esteem as "a person's feelings of social adequacy. Coopersmith self-esteem inventory Coopersmith [ 4 ] defined self-esteem as "positive and negative attitudes toward oneself.

Pope's 5-scale test of self-esteem for children Pope [ 5 ] defined self-esteem as the evaluative feelings one holds for oneself and the sense that one has essential worth, and asserted that self-esteem is evaluated as the difference between the actual self and the ideal self.

Ziller social self-esteem scale Ziller [ 8 ] believed that self-esteem is "the individual's perception of his worth, which comes about from a context of self-other orientation. Implicit association test Evaluation methods that use questionnaires have long been criticized as being susceptible to self-delusion, social circumstances, and social norms due to subjects being able to control their responses [ 9 ].

Development of self-esteem The development of a child's self-esteem is heavily influenced by the environment in which he or she is raised. Problems that cause lower self-esteem and countermeasures Healthy self-esteem supports psychological stability and positive social activity and is an essential element for a child's psychological development.

Usefulness of evaluating self-esteem in children with psychosomatic disorders In treating children with psychosomatic disorders, we noted that intractable patients share common characteristics, such as low self-evaluation and complaints of feeling disrespected or unwanted at school or home. Case study: year-old male Diagnosis: Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Process: The subject suffered from abdominal aches in June of the first year of middle school.

Table 1 The change of self-esteem Full size table. Discussion If we assume that low self-esteem has an impact on patient prognosis, then it is beneficial from a therapeutic standpoint to identify and address the causes of low self-esteem.

Conclusion Self-esteem is the "feeling of self-appreciation" and is an indispensable emotion for people to adapt to society and live their lives. References 1. Google Scholar 4. Google Scholar 7. Google Scholar Article Google Scholar